<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Splog Spot Blog &#187; Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.splogspot.com/category/tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.splogspot.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Protect Your Blog Content</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2010/09/protect-your-blog-content/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2010/09/protect-your-blog-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protect content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t you just hate it when you spend hours on a blog post only to see the exact same content in another site?  It takes you a long time to come up with a particular topic or idea, a little bit more to put the bits and pieces together, and then some more to actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.splogspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2490149553_1ab71c7dea_m.jpg"><img src="http://blog.splogspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2490149553_1ab71c7dea_m.jpg" alt="" title="guard dog" width="224" height="240" class="alignright size-full wp-image-84" /></a>Don&#8217;t you just hate it when you spend hours on a blog post only to see the exact same content in another site?  It takes you a long time to come up with a particular topic or idea, a little bit more to put the bits and pieces together, and then some more to actually write out the post.  And, just like that, someone thinks he/she can take your content &#8211; live off your hard work!</p>
<p>It is thus no surprise that various sectors &#8211; and individuals as well &#8211; have made it their mission to help bring down splogs (including us).  This endeavor also means taking certain steps on your part to ensure that your blog content is protected to a certain degree.  After all, if sploggers were to have a harder time stealing content, they just might give it up.</p>
<p>What can you do to make it hard for sploggers to steal your content?</p>
<h2>Plugins</h2>
<p>There are many plugins that you can utilize to make it harder for sploggers to steal your content.  They work in various ways, the end goal being the same: to protect your content.  Some plug ins work by disabling functions that will allow the text to be manually copied.  Others work by feeding bots fake content when they try to steal the content.  Take a look around and see what you can use to protect your posts.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.ntt.com/worldwide/service/datacenter.html">Data service centers</a>/Web hosting services</h2>
<p>You may not think about it, but your web hosting company might play a role in the security of your data.  After all, the information that you post in your blog will be stored in the data center used by your web host.  If they have security issues, sploggers may be the least of your worries.  What can you do?  Make sure that you choose the right web hosting company &#8211; one that will ensure the security of your data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2010/09/protect-your-blog-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mouse overs and splogs</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/09/mouse-overs-and-splogs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/09/mouse-overs-and-splogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse over]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your mouse is a great tool in immediately finding out if a blog or web site is actually a splog. You have to remember that most splogs are nothing more than link lists. A good way to immediately determine if a blog is actually a splog is by gliding your mouse over any link in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mouse is a great tool in immediately finding out if a blog or web site is actually a splog. You have to remember that most splogs are nothing more than link lists. A good way to immediately determine if a blog is actually a splog is by gliding your mouse over any link in the page. If you see a very long code and not the usual links that is quite familiar to anyone who surfs the net then you&#8217;ve found a splog. That long code is actually the <a href="http://covertaffiliatelinks.com/">affiliate clickthrough</a> information.</p>
<p>Of course, sploggers are quite devious in that they also have other ways of going around this easy tell. Some sploggers actually have hidden link information. This means that when you hover over a link in a splog you won&#8217;t see the link appearing in the status bar. Of course, when you think about it, a legitimate web site won&#8217;t go through the trouble of hiding a link so, ironically enough, it becomes another clue that you are visiting a splog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/09/mouse-overs-and-splogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most splogs don&#8217;t even hide their true nature</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/most-splogs-dont-even-hide-their-true-nature/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/most-splogs-dont-even-hide-their-true-nature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may be surprised to know that the most common form for splogs is one that doesn&#8217;t even hide what it really is. It actually makes sense because sploggers are a lazy bunch who can&#8217;t even make their own content so it stands to reason they&#8217;ll be too lazy to even hide the true intentions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be surprised to know that the most common form for splogs is one that doesn&#8217;t even hide what it really is. It actually makes sense because sploggers are a lazy bunch who can&#8217;t even make their own content so it stands to reason they&#8217;ll be too lazy to even hide the true intentions of their splog. </p>
<p>These splogs are just a list of links leading to their <a href="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=7138905">advertisers</a>. Usually the advertisers are often called sponsors, which in a way is also true because these are companies that pay to be included in the list.</p>
<p>Advertisers get benefits from being in splogs. The link points to their site and their keywords can now be found by search engines in another location. Of course, the advertising benefit is there as their coverage increases on the internet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/most-splogs-dont-even-hide-their-true-nature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Splogs take advantage of feeds</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/splogs-take-advantage-of-feeds/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/splogs-take-advantage-of-feeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you see a blog that relies heavily on feeds then you&#8217;ve stumbled upon a another splog. Sploggers (these guys are growing like weeds on the netosphere) will use the most inventive ways in employing feeds to get juicy content from other sites and then pass it off as their own content. they typically use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you see a blog that relies heavily on feeds then you&#8217;ve stumbled upon a another splog. </p>
<p>Sploggers (these guys are growing like weeds on the <a href="http://www.funnycorner.net/search/netosphere.html">netosphere</a>) will use the most inventive ways in employing feeds to get juicy content from other sites and then pass it off as their own content. they typically use variations of certain tactics to mask their splog and pass it off as benign site. </p>
<p>One tactic sploggers use is to grab feeds from different sites that have content that is similar or related to the splog&#8217;s &#8220;content&#8221;. They then use the excerpts in a manner that is similar to a blockquote &#8212; and this will even include links to the original source through the feed. There are those who are more brazen with getting content. These sploggers will lift the whole articles and content from the various related feeds and pass it off as their own. It&#8217;s really unfair especially for those whose content has been basically stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/08/splogs-take-advantage-of-feeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red flag on non-original content</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/red-flag-on-non-original-content/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/red-flag-on-non-original-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kind of content that you read on a blog can give you a clue whether a blog is actually a splog. To be fair, not a lot of blogs really give you all original content. Most blogs will feature posts that quote from the posts of other people or other websites, while other just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kind of content that you read on a blog can give you a clue whether a blog is actually a splog. </p>
<p>To be fair, not a lot of blogs really give you all original content. Most blogs will feature posts that quote from the posts of other people or other websites, while other just post links directly to the content the blog owner finds interesting. There is actually nothing wrong with this and this is not what a splog does. A splog will be devoid of absolutely any kind of original content and will have a wanton disregard for Fair Use by completely ignoring the use of block quotes by just pasting the derived content on their blog without any kind of attribution or sign that it was lifted from another source.</p>
<p>A good way to find out about splogs through its content is by going to the suspicious blog&#8217;s categories and its archives looking at signs of whether the content was written as an original piece. This can be quite difficult but you&#8217;ll see subtle signs that an article was lifted entirely from another site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/red-flag-on-non-original-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erratic post counts can signal a splog</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/erratic-post-counts-can-signal-a-splog/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/erratic-post-counts-can-signal-a-splog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post counts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oftentimes you will encounter a blog that generates an insane amount of posts. A regular blog that has a number of writers will usually post an impressive number of posts but when you see a blog that lists posts in an archive or category and the numbers are just too dubious then you are most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oftentimes you will encounter a blog that generates an insane amount of posts. A regular blog that has a number of writers will usually post an impressive number of posts but when you see a blog that lists posts in an archive or category and the numbers are just too dubious then you are most likely visiting a splog. Some splog operators would even shoot themselves in the foot because of their wanton disregard for common sense. For example, you will see blog posts in splogs that date back to years when the <a href="http://www.livinginternet.com/">internet</a> wasn&#8217;t even widely available, much less when blogs were already in existence. </p>
<p>When you go to a dubious looking blog check out the categories and the archives based on the date. If you see that posts number in the hundreds or thousands at some point in the past but absolutely nothing (or very few) since then, or if you notice that the posts are quite erratic (hundreds of posts in one month, a two month lull and then another burst of blogs after three months) then your splog radar should start pinging loudly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/07/erratic-post-counts-can-signal-a-splog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Splog Identification 101: It just doesn&#8217;t add up</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/06/splog-identification-101-it-just-doesnt-add-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/06/splog-identification-101-it-just-doesnt-add-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With splogs and all kinds of spammy tactics being employed by unscrupulous people on the internet, the world wide web is getting polluted by these dubious strategies. Because these kinds of tactics are frowned upon, splog makers are making it harder and harder for people to identify splogs. Fortunately, there are still some tell-tale signs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With splogs and all kinds of spammy tactics being employed by unscrupulous people on the internet, the world wide web is getting polluted by these dubious strategies. Because these kinds of tactics are frowned upon, splog makers are making it harder and harder for people to identify <a href="http://www.fightsplog.com/">splogs</a>. Fortunately, there are still some tell-tale signs that will alert you if the blog that you are reading is actually a splog. </p>
<p>One of the ways of determining if a blog is actually a splog is by paying attention to the content. A real blog actually makes sense in how it is published. The content matches the links and the title. Splogs do not care about matching or having an actual internal design. The content will not match the links or even the blog&#8217;s title or the post title. There are even some posts where the signature or the name in the article doesn&#8217;t match the name of the post author.</p>
<p>Another example of how splogs do not &#8220;add up&#8221; is that the sentences or the thoughts being expressed in the post don&#8217;t make sense. You could be reading a post on a popular TV show that will suddenly turn into a description of a porn movie. This will also extend to how paragraphs are composed &#8212; usually with each paragraph talking about really unrelated subjects &#8212; for example, a post that begins with a tour of India turns into a description of a new drug then becomes a paragraph hawking a new diet. Even how the sentences are constructed is made haphazardly, you&#8217;d swear some random guy just began typing all of the English words he knows.</p>
<p>When you see these things happening in a blog you&#8217;re reading, stop. You&#8217;re just going to waste your time reading a splog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/06/splog-identification-101-it-just-doesnt-add-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nifty Tools Dificult Tools</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/nifty-tools-dificult-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/nifty-tools-dificult-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The clamor to come up with an answer to the rising splog threat has many authors developing ways of securing and monitoring blogs that would be a good indicator of any attempts to hack or modify your posts. One such easy way to monitor your blog is with the DigoWatchWP which closely monitors your blogs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.splogspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/steal.jpg" alt="steal" width="128" height="63" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-37" />The clamor to come up with an answer to the rising splog threat has many authors developing ways of securing and monitoring blogs that would be a good indicator of any attempts to hack or modify your posts. One such easy way to monitor your blog is with the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/digowatchwp/">DigoWatchWP</a> which closely monitors your blogs on WordPress and sends you an email if any changes are found, even if the email says there is no change. <span id="more-36"></span><br />
WPIDS is a blog protection system that is developed for the WP platform that prevents malicious code injection into your blogs. The filters will notify you of any attempts to modify your blog that is modified along with the many WP updates that come and goes as they come out of the grinder. There are some <a href="http://php-ids.org/2007/09/12/wpids-phpids-your-wordpress-the-comfy-way/">issues to address</a> that may need sone study and implementation may need quite some extensive PHP knowledge.<br />
Some other projects are in the works and they promise more <a href="http://firewallscript.com/wordpressfirewall.htm">robust protection</a> for WordPress-based blogs though some of the previously best and free ones have gone off-line there are a lot more coming out to help you and your blog to survive the ever growing perils of the social internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/nifty-tools-dificult-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Syndication &#8211; On the Right Track?</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/fair-syndication-on-the-right-track/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/fair-syndication-on-the-right-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advent and rise of the splogs has triggered a debate between bloggers, the online ads industry and the Fair Syndication Consortium that debates the situation whether ad companies should remunerate web sites that use stolen content. The opposing parties has people on both sides raising their own points, on the side of the bloggers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.splogspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/fair.jpg" alt="fair" width="285" height="530" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-33" />The advent and rise of the splogs has triggered a debate between bloggers, the online ads industry and the <a href="http://www.fairsyndication.org/">Fair Syndication Consortium</a> that debates the situation whether ad companies should remunerate web sites that use stolen content. The opposing parties has people on both sides raising their own points, on the side of the bloggers content should be guarded and deemed as personal property, on the side of the consortium they say that they are fighting for the said right, getting these <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%E2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/">splog sites</a> to get their claimed earnings from ads but steering some of the profits down the line to the bloggers who were responsible for the blog posts.<br />
Very much a blurred line exists between the grounds by which they stand, and being sponsored by many big businesses and other major players the consortium is indeed raising a very real fact, splogs are here and there is no sure way to combat them or prevent them from plagiarizing content from other sites, kinda goes to the tune of &#8220;If you can;t beat them, Join them!&#8221;. The bloggers and several thousand writers are still trying to obtain ways of shutting down these <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/21/startup-tries-to-rally-publishers-with-ad-sharing-proposal/">splogging sites</a> but as mentioned, there are ways by which you can indeed profit from these sites but the line is thin and you can end up losing more that you hope to gain. The debate is detailed in the following post from <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/">TechCrunch</a> where more details are brought to light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/fair-syndication-on-the-right-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Splog Mechanics</title>
		<link>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/splog-mechanics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/splog-mechanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.splogspot.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know of the situation, you work hard researching a blog post and you get it out to the most people possible through the many publishing methods on the web making your content work for you. Then you notice that your very much colorful blog is losing authority and find that your RSS feeds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.splogspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/splog1.jpg" alt="splog1" width="124" height="93" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-20" />We all know of the situation, you work hard researching a blog post and you get it out to the most people possible through the many publishing methods on the web making your content work for you. Then you notice that your very much colorful blog is losing authority and find that your RSS feeds are being tapped by unknown people stealing your content and claiming them as their own getting the exposure you should have been and not even giving you any credit for it. Call it copy/paste, plagiarism and even plagiarism but stealing is stealing yet with the problem out in the open, why hasn&#8217;t anybody thought of a way to seek these sites and shut them down?<span id="more-19"></span> Even the many a brilliant minds out there on the net have admitted again and again that the net is too vast a territory to police and such activities are too random and predictable at the same time that there is no specific way to root them out.<br />
One method employed by established bloggers is to use an <a href="http://redalt.com/Resources/Plugins/AntiLeech">AntiLeech plug-in</a> which creates a fake blog post for them to lock onto, at the same time obtaining their IP Addresses and blocking further attempts by these crazy bots from stealing further content. It also works by setting up the fake blogs with a link-back that links back to your site that can be annoying to the splogger. There is a problem though, any content already stolen is not recoverable and as fast as it does it&#8217;s work to prevent the act, the bot adapts and changes IP address again getting hold of more of your precious posts. The fake posts look legit enough to trap these <a href="http://www.bsacybersafety.com/threat/splog.cfm">splogging bots</a> yet they are reacting seemingly as if preempting such actions. More in the coming posts on how these nuisance programs work and how we can fight back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.splogspot.com/2009/04/splog-mechanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

